How many times has [2001] RPC 27 been cited?

[2001] RPC 27 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2001] RPC 27

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2001] RPC 27

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — E Mishan & Sons, Inc v Hozelock Ltd & Ors 2020-07-08
“…“I accept that the ‘mindset’ of the skilled person can be a factor preventing him from seeing something as obvious: see Dyson Appliances Ltd v Hoover Ltd [2001] RPC 27 (and on appeal [2001] EWCA Civ 1440) where the mindset in the vacuum cleaner industry was such that no-one would think of dispensing with a bag, and the skille…”
Cited — E Mishan & Sons, Inc v Hozelock Ltd & Ors 2020-07-08
“…I accept that the ‘mindset’ of the skilled person can be a factor preventing him from seeing something as obvious: see Dyson Appliances Ltd v Hoover Ltd [2001] RPC 27 (and on appeal [2001] EWCA Civ 1440) where the mindset in the vacuum cleaner industry was such that no-one would think of dispensing with a bag, and the skille…”