How many times has [2002] 1 WLR 1192 been cited?

[2002] 1 WLR 1192 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2002] 1 WLR 1192

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2002] 1 WLR 1192

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Applied · 1Cited · 1

Applied — Mackie Motors (Brechin) Limited v RCI Financial Services Limited 2023-05-04
“…It was also said by Mackie that the judge applied the legal test in Modahl v British Athletic Federation Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1447, [2002] 1 WLR 1192 incorrectly, gave no real weight to the matters pleaded in the DAPOC and had no proper regard to the evidence likely to be available at trial.…”
Cited — Mackie Motors (Brechin) Limited v RCI Financial Services Limited 2023-05-04
“… in 2001 in [Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks & Spencer plc [2001] EWCA Civ 274, [2002] 1 All ER (Comm) 737]and in Modhal v. British Athletic Federation Ltd. [2002] 1 WLR 1192. The first principles stated in the latter judgment at paragraph 100 are valuable: “[f]or there to be a contract, there must be (a) agreement on essentials of …”