- Cited — Phillip Gwyn James Evans v Barclays Bank PLC & Ors 2023-11-09
“…(Bird v Keep [1918] 2 KB 692) and extra-statutory inquiries (Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of The Bank of England (No.3) [2001] UKHL 16, [2003] 2 AC 1). He stated:…”
- Cited — National Iranian Oil Company v Crescent Petroleum Company International Ltd & Anor 2023-07-13
“…accordance with the well-known guidance set out by Lord Hope of Craighead in Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 3) [2003] 2 AC 1:…”
- Cited — CNM Estates (Tolworth Tower) Limited v Simon Peter Carvill-Biggs & Anor 2023-05-05
“…leaded insufficient facts in support of their case to entitle the Court to draw the necessary inferences: Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England (No3) [2003] 2 AC 1.…”
- Cited — CNM Estates (Tolworth Tower) Limited v Simon Peter Carvill-Biggs & Anor 2023-05-05
“…In Three Rivers District Council v. Bank of England (No 3) [2001] UKHL 16, [2003] 2 AC 1, Lord Hope had reiterated that it is not appropriate to conduct a mini-trial on an application for summary judgment. He said at [95]:…”
- Cited — Mackie Motors (Brechin) Limited v RCI Financial Services Limited 2023-05-04
“…leaded insufficient facts in support of their case to entitle the Court to draw the necessary inferences: Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England (No3) [2003] 2 AC 1.…”
- Cited — Seema Ashraf v Lester Dominic Solicitors & Ors 2023-01-13
“…The criterion is not probability but absence of reality: Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No 3) [2003] 2 AC 1 at [158] per Lord Hobhouse.…”
- Cited — Re W-A (Children: Foreign Conviction) 2022-08-05
“…[2003] 2 AC 1 (HL)…”
- Cited — Begum v Maran (UK) Ltd 2021-03-10
“…The court must not conduct a mini-trial: Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 3) [2003] 2 AC 1, in particular paragraph 95. Although the court should not automatically accept what the claimant says at face value, it will ordinarily do so unless its factu…”
- Cited — Sofer v Swissindependent Trustees SA 2020-06-05
“…ficiently particularised if the facts alleged are consistent with innocence: Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No.3) [2003] 2 AC 1.…”
- Cited — Bank St Petersburg PJSC & Anor v Arkhangelsky & Anor 2020-03-18
“…nsel for the respondents, highlighted a number of passages in the authorities. For example, in Three Rivers District Council v. Bank of England [2001] UKHL 16; [2003] 2 AC 1 (“Three Rivers”), Lord Hope said at [55] that “[a]s the facts referred to might have inferred dishonesty but were consistent with innocence, it was not to be p…”
- Cited — Elite Property Holdings Ltd & Anor v Barclays Bank Plc 2019-02-21
“… pleaded insufficient facts in support of their case to entitle the Court to draw the necessary inferences: Three Rivers District Council vBank of England(No3) [2003] 2 AC 1.…”
- Applied — General Mediterranean Holding SA SPF v Qucomhaps Holdings Ltd & Ors 2018-10-31
“… which the judge has to apply under Part 24 is not one of probability; it is absence of reality” (per Lord Hobhouse in Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No 3) [2003] 2 AC 1, at paragraph 158) and that “proper disposal of an issue under Pt 24 does not involve the judge conducting a mini-trial” (as Lord Woolf MR pointed out in Swain…”
- Cited — Rees & Ors v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis 2018-07-05
“…asance in public office, the judge directed himself by reference to the speech of Lord Steyn in the House of Lords in Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No. 3) [2003] 2 AC 1, 191B-194C.…”
- Cited — Iiyama (UK) Limited & Ors. v Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. & Ors. 2018-02-16
“… trial. The remedy of summary judgment, as Lord Hope of Craighead said in Three Rivers District Council vThe Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 3) [2003] 2 AC 1 at 261, is “to deal with cases that are not fit for trial at all.”…”