- Cited — Andrew McCarthy v William Allan Jones & Anor. 2023-05-25
“…ll normally be ordered to pay the costs of the respondent to the application. But as Aldous LJ said in Totalise plc v The Motley Fool Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1897, [2002] 1 WLR 1233 at [29]:…”
- Approved — Alexander Gorbachev v Andrey Grigoreyvich Guriev 2023-03-28
“…e behaviour connotes more than just actively opposing the application. The principle is established in Totalise Plc v The Motley Fool Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1897, [2002] 1 WLR 1233; Miller Brewing Co v Mersey Docks and Harbour Company [2003] EWHC 1606 (Ch), [2004] FSR 5, each approved by the Supreme Court in Cartier International AG v Bri…”
- Approved — Jofa Ltd & Anor v Benherst Finance Ltd & Anor 2019-05-24
“…rty ordered to give disclosure, including the costs of the application. The Court of Appeal so held in Totalise Plc v The Motley Fool Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1897; [2002] 1 WLR 1233. That decision has recently been approved by the Supreme Court in Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd [2018] UKSC 28; [2018] 1 WLR 3259. On…”
- Cited — Jofa Ltd & Anor v Benherst Finance Ltd & Anor 2019-05-24
“…In TotalisePlc v The Motley Fool Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1897; [2002] 1 WLR 1233, para 33, Aldous LJ, giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal, expanded on the circumstances in which the applicant should be ordered to pay the costs of the…”