- Cited — Andrew McCarthy v William Allan Jones & Anor. 2023-05-25
“… case the applicant will normally be ordered to pay the costs of the respondent to the application. But as Aldous LJ said in Totalise plc v The Motley Fool Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1897, [2002] 1 WLR 1233 at [29]:…”
- Approved — Alexander Gorbachev v Andrey Grigoreyvich Guriev 2023-03-28
“…easonably. Unreasonable behaviour connotes more than just actively opposing the application. The principle is established in Totalise Plc v The Motley Fool Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1897, [2002] 1 WLR 1233; Miller Brewing Co v Mersey Docks and Harbour Company [2003] EWHC 1606 (Ch), [2004] FSR 5, each approved by the Supreme Court in Cartier Int…”
- Approved — Jofa Ltd & Anor v Benherst Finance Ltd & Anor 2019-05-24
“…ay the costs of the party ordered to give disclosure, including the costs of the application. The Court of Appeal so held in Totalise Plc v The Motley Fool Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1897; [2002] 1 WLR 1233. That decision has recently been approved by the Supreme Court in Cartier International AG v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd [2018] UKSC 28; [2…”
- Cited — Jofa Ltd & Anor v Benherst Finance Ltd & Anor 2019-05-24
“…In TotalisePlc v The Motley Fool Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1897; [2002] 1 WLR 1233, para 33, Aldous LJ, giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal, expanded on the circumstances in which the applicant should be ordered to p…”