How many times has [2003] 1 WLR 307 been cited?

[2003] 1 WLR 307 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2003] 1 WLR 307

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2003] 1 WLR 307

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Applied · 1

Cited — Phones 4U Ltd v EE Ltd & Ors 2021-02-02
“…See Compagnie Noga D’Importation et d’Expotation SA v. Abacha (No3) [2003] 1 WLR 307 to the effect that an appeal lies against the result of a hearing rather than the reasons for the result.…”
Applied — AS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-02-21
“…apply in particular cases (see, for example, Compagnie Noga d'Importation et d’Exportation SA v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1142, [2003] 1 WLR 307, discussed in A (a Child); also B (a Minor) [2000] 1 WLR 790).…”
Cited — Wolff v Trinity Logistics Usa Inc 2018-12-12
“… decision bearing on the point since 1999, namely Cie Noga d’Importation et d’Exportation SA v Australia andNew Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1142, [2003] 1 WLR 307. In that unusual case, Rix LJ, sitting at first instance, had had to determine whether litigation had been compromised by a settlement agreement. He found that…”