- Cited — Braceurself Limited v NHS England 2023-07-14
“…“Lake v Lake [1955] P 336 when properly understood means that if the decision when properly analysed and if it were to be recorded in a formal order would be one that the would-be appel…”
- Cited — Verition Advisors (UK Partners) LLP v Jump Trading International Limited 2023-06-20
“…inst adverse findings of fact or reasons unless they are part of the basis for an adverse order, in which case the appeal is against the order: see Lake v Lake [1955] P 336, [1955] 3 WLR 145, where a judge had held that there had been adultery but that it had been condoned and therefore refused to make it the basis of a divorce de…”
- Cited — N (A Child) 2019-11-19
“… the finding being one that has potential legal consequences. It is not open to a party to appeal a finding simply because they do not like it: see Lake v Lake [1955] P 336; Cie Noga d'Importation et d'Exportation SA v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2002] EWCA 1142 at [27-28]; and Re M (Children) [2013] EWCA Civ 1170…”
- Cited — E (Children: Reopening Findings of Fact) 2019-08-14
“… the finding being one that has potential legal consequences. It is not open to a party to appeal a finding simply because they do not like it: see Lake v Lake [1955] P 336; Cie Noga d'Importation et d'Exportation SA v Australia and New…”
- Cited — AS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-02-21
“…RSC”, being the predecessor to the Civil Procedure Rules) and in the primary legislation; and specifically on the earlier decision of this Court in Lake v Lake [1955] P 336 (which itself relies on earlier authority). On the basis of that authority he held that the words “judgment or order” in CPR 40. 12 (1) were limited to the “fo…”
- Cited — Wolff v Trinity Logistics Usa Inc 2018-12-12
“…Lake [1955] P 336 the Court of Appeal held that “judgment or order”, in this context, means “the formal judgment or order which is drawn up and disposes of the proceedings and w…”
- Cited — Wolff v Trinity Logistics Usa Inc 2018-12-12
“…Lake v Lake [1955] P 336 properly understood means that if the decision when properly analysed and if it were to be recorded in a formal order would be one that the would-be appellant …”