- Explained — Floreat Investment Management Limited v Benjamin Churchill & Ors 2023-04-25
“…As explained in Bank St Petersburg PJSC v Arkhangelsky [2020] EWCA Civ 408, [2020] 4 WLR 55 at [78] to [84] and Dansingani v Canara Bank [2021] EWCA Civ 714 at [85], the general rule is that a judgment in the Business and Property Cou…”
- Cited — Dansingani & Anor v Canara Bank 2021-05-20
“…nd that the judgment under appeal was unduly delayed have recently been reviewed by Sir Geoffey Vos C (as he then was) in Bank St Petersburg PJSC v Arkangelsky [2020] EWCA Civ 408, [2020] 4 WLR 55 at [77]-[88], by Lord Hodge giving the judgment of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in Plant v Pickle Properties Ltd [2021] UKPC 6 …”
- Cited — Natwest Markets Plc & Anor v Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors 2021-05-10
“…As Sir Geoffrey Vos, then the Chancellor of the High Court, emphasised in the more recent case of Bank St Petersburg v Arkhangelsky [2020] EWCA Civ 408, the general, albeit unwritten, rule is that a judgment should be delivered within 3 months of the hearing. That rule should be adhered to even in long and com…”
- Cited — Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Azima 2021-03-12
“…v Arkhangelsky [2020] EWCA Civ 408, [2020] 4 WLR 55); or there is “some identifiable flaw in the judge’s treatment of the question to be decided, such as a gap in logic, a lack of consistency, o…”