How many times has [2003] 2 FLR 108 been cited?

[2003] 2 FLR 108 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2003] 2 FLR 108

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2003] 2 FLR 108

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Versteegh v Versteegh 2018-05-10
“…ever that Wells was a wholly singular case and should be regarded as such by the courts: see for example GW v RW (Financial Provision: Departure from Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108 and WM v HM [2017] EWFC 25, [2017] 3 FCR 198.…”
Cited — Versteegh v Versteegh 2018-05-10
“…set in question should not be sold, Wells sharing may be the only option left. As Mr Mostyn QC put it in GW v RW (Financial Provision: Departure from Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108 at [64]:…”
Cited — Waggott v Waggott 2018-04-11
“…acity brought by one spouse into the marriage … an approach first favoured by Mr Nicholas Mostyn QC … in GW v RW (Financial Provision: Departure from Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108”…”