- Cited — ST v BAI (SA) trading as Brittany Ferries 2022-07-27
“… the claimant has taken “all reasonable steps” to comply with CPR 7.5. There is, as it was put in the leading case of Hashtroodi v Hancock [2004] EWCA Civ 652, [2004] 1 WLR 3206 at [17] (“Hashtroodi”), a “striking” “contrast” between the two regimes.…”
- Cited — Qatar Investments and Project Development Holding Company & Anor. v Phoenix Ancient Art S.A. 2022-03-30
“…First, the Court’s power to extend time is to be exercised in accordance with the overriding objective (Hashtroodi v Hancock [2004] 1 WLR 3206 at [18]; Al Zahra at [49(2)]).…”
- Cited — Islandsbanki Hf & Ors v Stanford 2020-04-02
“… voidable and not void and could be remedied under CPR r 3.10. See in particular, [29] and [30]. She also noted that this court had held in Hashtroodiv Hancock [2004] 1 WLR 3206 that there was no need to give the phrase “error of procedure” in CPR r3.10 an artificially restrictive meaning but had noted at [24] that “the general languag…”
- Cited — Al-Zahra (PVT) Hospital & Ors v DDM 2019-06-27
“…First, Hashtroodi v Hancock [2004] 1 WLR 3206, which concerned an appeal against a Deputy Master’s refusal to set aside a “without notice” extension of time for service of a claim form which had been grant…”
- Cited — Société Générale v Goldas Kuyumculuk Sanayi Ithalat Ihracat A.S. & Ors 2018-05-15
“… which is commonly found in decisions about relief from sanctions. This accounts for the reasoning in the cases on which the judge relied, Hashtroodi v Hancock [2004] 1 WLR 3206 para 20 per Dyson LJ and Aktas v Adepta [2011] QB 894, para 71 per Rix LJ who said in terms:-…”