- Cited — ST v BAI (SA) trading as Brittany Ferries 2022-07-27
“… emphasised that there was no need for a claimant to establish that all reasonable steps had been taken. He referred to the comments of Rix LJ in Aktasv Adepta [2011] QB 894 at [91], where Rix LJ referred to the need for strict regulation of the period for service to avoid the statutory limitation period becoming “elastic at the wh…”
- Cited — Qatar Investments and Project Development Holding Company & Anor. v Phoenix Ancient Art S.A. 2022-03-30
“…In a concurring judgment, at [76] Rix LJ re-stated a passage from an earlier judgment, Atkas v Adepta [2011] QB 894, at [91]:…”
- Cited — Cable v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Co Ltd 2020-07-31
“…49 and Aktas v Adepta [2010] EWCA Civ 1170, [2011] QB 894, where Rix LJ said at para 92:…”
- Cited — SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd 2020-05-12
“…ation clause has been agreed between the parties. In this respect it is analogous to the concept of abuse of process: see Aktas v. Adepta [2010] EWCA Civ 1170, [2011] QB 894 at [53]. In both cases, those of vexatious or oppressive conduct and abuse of process respectively, an evaluative assessment has to be made, which is not an ex…”
- Cited — Harbour Castle Ltd v David Wilson Homes Ltd 2019-03-27
“… established by several decisions of this court, including Stuart v Goldberg Linde [2008] EWCA Civ 2, [2008] 1 WLR 823 and Atkas v Adepta [2010] EWCA Civ 1170, [2011] QB 894. If it is an abuse, the court has a discretion whether to strike it out, but, as Rix LJ said in Atkas v Adepta at [53], once satisfied that the second action i…”
- Cited — Société Générale v Goldas Kuyumculuk Sanayi Ithalat Ihracat A.S. & Ors 2018-05-15
“…nctions. This accounts for the reasoning in the cases on which the judge relied, Hashtroodi v Hancock [2004] 1 WLR 3206 para 20 per Dyson LJ and Aktas v Adepta [2011] QB 894, para 71 per Rix LJ who said in terms:-…”