- Cited — Shahanas Kanhirakandan v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-11-06
“…The Secretary of State relied on E v Secretary of State for the Home Department; joined with R v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 49, [2004] QB 1044 in support of her cross-appeal (this case I shall refer to as E and R).…”
- Cited — R. (on the application of Sarah Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group) v Surrey County Council 2022-02-17
“…ous and objectively verifiable played a material part in the decision-maker's reasoning: see E v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 49; [2004] QB 1044.”…”
- Cited — Hoareau & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs 2020-07-30
“…d by the applicant, and which mistake must have played a material part in the reasoning, see E v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 49, [2004] QB 1044, at paragraph 66.…”
- Doubted — Michael, R (on the application of) v HMP Whitemoor & Anor 2020-01-23
“…eded upon a straightforward and undisputed misunderstanding of a central material fact, of the sort discussed in E v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] QB 1044. That fact was at the heart of the request made by Mr Michael. He no doubt appreciated that there would be insuperable difficulties in producing him for a hear…”
- Cited — Wilson & Ors , R (On the Application Of) v The Prime Minister 2019-03-04
“…unning from the judgment of Carnwath LJ (as he then was) giving the judgment of this court in E v Secretary ofState for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 49; [2004] QB 1044 at [66], Ms Simor submits that the Respondent’s decision to notify withdrawal from the EU was unlawful, because it was based upon an error of fact, namely that…”
- Cited — KV, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-11-08
“… depart from them in exceptional circumstances if the wider interests of justice so require: E v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 49; [2004] QB 1044, paras 79-82.…”