- Cited — Shahanas Kanhirakandan v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-11-06
“… those proceedings. The Secretary of State relied on E v Secretary of State for the Home Department; joined with R v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 49, [2004] QB 1044 in support of her cross-appeal (this case I shall refer to as E and R).…”
- Cited — R. (on the application of Sarah Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group) v Surrey County Council 2022-02-17
“…which was uncontentious and objectively verifiable played a material part in the decision-maker's reasoning: see E v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 49; [2004] QB 1044.”…”
- Cited — Flynn, R (On the Application Of) v The London Borough of Southwark Council & Anor 2021-05-28
“…lynn] does not arise”. So “the first element of the test set out in [paragraph 66 of Carnwath L.J.’s judgment in E v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 49,[2004] Q.B. 1044] [was] not satisfied”. There was “no mistake as to an existing fact in terms of whether or not grant funding had been secured from the GLA for…”
- Cited — Al-Siri, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-02-08
“…In E & R v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 49 this court emphasised (at [81]) that Sir John Donaldson’s dictum above did not show that Ladd v Marshall principles have “no place” in public law. Rather it sh…”
- Cited — Hoareau & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs 2020-07-30
“…stake was not created by the applicant, and which mistake must have played a material part in the reasoning, see E v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 49, [2004] QB 1044, at paragraph 66.…”
- Cited — Baci Bedfordshire Ltd, R (on the application of) v The Environment Agency & Anor 2019-11-19
“…makov [1996] 2 All E.R. 302). Such explanations do not displace the principles set out by the Court of Appeal in E v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 49. The error here was obvious and uncontentious. It did not need to be proved. Its effect was to undermine the rationale for the operating techniques intended to…”
- Cited — Kabir v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-07-09
“…ents for being admitted on an appeal, either pursuant to the principles in Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489 or those appearing in E and R v Secretary of State [2004] EWCA Civ 49;…”
- Cited — Wilson & Ors , R (On the Application Of) v The Prime Minister 2019-03-04
“…e of jurisprudence running from the judgment of Carnwath LJ (as he then was) giving the judgment of this court in E v Secretary ofState for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 49; [2004] QB 1044 at [66], Ms Simor submits that the Respondent’s decision to notify withdrawal from the EU was unlawful, because it was based upon an error of f…”
- Cited — KV, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-11-08
“…e is a discretion to depart from them in exceptional circumstances if the wider interests of justice so require: E v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] EWCA Civ 49; [2004] QB 1044, paras 79-82.…”