How many times has [2005] 1 WLR 1718 been cited?

[2005] 1 WLR 1718 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2005] 1 WLR 1718

· cited by 3 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2005] 1 WLR 1718

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Hugh Murphy & Anor. v The Commissioners for HMRC 2023-05-15
“…n that is practicable having regard to the staff available to them and the cost of collection”. In R (Wilkinson) v Inland Revenue Commissioners [2005] UKHL 30, [2005] 1 WLR 1718, Lord Hoffmann observed in paragraph 21 that this discretion:…”
Cited — Mark Mitchell & Anor. v The Commissioners for HMRC 2023-03-10
“…nesses Ltd [1982] AC 617 (the “Fleet Street Casuals” case) at p 636 per Lord Diplock, confirmed in R (Wilkinson) v Inland Revenue Commissioners [2005] UKHL 30, [2005] 1 WLR 1718 per Lord Hoffmann at [20]. The duty of confidence which HMRC owes to taxpayers has also long been recognised as part and parcel of the care and management func…”
Cited — MD v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022-03-16
“…[2005] UKHL 30, [2005] 1 WLR 1718, it had been held that the article 14 rights of a widower had been breached by the denial of a bereavement allowance that the Inland Revenue would have accorde…”