How many times has [2005] 1 WLR 717 been cited?

[2005] 1 WLR 717 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2005] 1 WLR 717

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2005] 1 WLR 717

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Sastry & Anor v General Medical Council 2021-04-30
“…Professionals v General Medical Council and Ruscillo [2005] 1 WLR 717. ……”
Cited — Raychaudhuri v General Medical Council 2018-09-14
“… A similar point was made by this court in Council for the Regulation of Health Care Professionals v General Medical Council and Ruscillo [2004] EWCA Civ 1356; [2005] 1 WLR 717 at [45] in the context of construing the extent of the PSA’s power of reference under section 29 of the 2002 Act;…”
Cited — Hussain v General Pharmaceutical Council (Rev 1) 2018-01-18
“…ld still accord them an appropriate measure of respect: see, eg, Council for the Regulation of Health Care Professionals v General Medical Council and Ruscillo [2005] 1 WLR 717. Those were undue leniency appeals by the Council for the Regulation of Health Care Professionals under section 29 of the 2002 Act against decisions of the rel…”