- Cited — TD & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work And Pensions 2020-05-12
“…he difference in treatment is manifestly disproportionate to the legitimate aim. This would accord with the statement of the European Court in Blecic v Croatia (2005) 41 EHRR 13, para 65, that it will accept the judgment of the domestic authorities in socioeconomic matters ‘unless that judgment is manifestly without reasonable foundati…”
- Cited — The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants 2020-04-21
“…r the difference in treatment is manifestly disproportionate to a legitimate aim. This would accord with the statement of the European Court in Blečić v Croatia(2005) 41 EHRR 13, para 65, that it will accept the judgment of the domestic authorities in socio-economic matters ‘unless that judgment is manifestly without reasonable foundat…”
- Cited — Langford v The Secretary of State for Defence 2019-07-17
“… the difference in treatment is manifestly disproportionate to a legitimate aim. This would accord with the statement of the European Court in Blecic v Croatia (2005) 41 EHRR 13, para 65, that it will accept the judgment of the domestic authorities in socio-economic matters "unless that judgment is manifestly without reasonable foundat…”
- Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“… the difference in treatment is manifestly disproportionate to a legitimate aim. This would accord with the statement of the European Court in Blečić v Croatia (2005) 41 EHRR 13, para 65, that it will accept the judgment of the domestic authorities in socioeconomic matters “unless that judgment is manifestly without reasonable foundati…”