- Cited — Dudley Metropolitan Council v Marilyn Mailley 2023-10-27
“…He also relies on In re Brewster [2017] SC 8, [2017] 1 WLR 519 at paragraphs 62 to 65 as to the correct approach to the scrutiny of justification when there is no evidence that the reasons advanced formed any part of the j…”
- Cited — The Motherhood Plan (R on the application of) v HM Treasury 2021-11-24
“… post facto justification requires particular scrutiny: Belfast City Council v Miss Behavin’ Ltd[2007] UKHL 19, [2007] 1 WLR 1420, In re Brewster[2017] UKSC 8, [2017] 1 WLR 519.…”
- Followed — TD & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work And Pensions 2020-05-12
“…of justification. This is the point to which the Judge made reference at para. 65 of her judgment, where she quoted Lord Kerr JSC in Re Brewster [2017] UKSC 8; [2017] 1 WLR 519, at para. 64. That passage included the following:…”
- Cited — Langford v The Secretary of State for Defence 2019-07-17
“…tionality test as required by Supreme Court authority, including Brewster v Northern Ireland Local Government Officers’ Superannuation Committee [2017] UKSC 8, [2017] 1 WLR 519 (‘Ground 2’).…”
- Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…(Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57; [2015] 1 WLR 3820), and being a co-habitee (see In Re Brewster [2017] UKSC 8; [2017] 1 WLR 519). On the other hand, in Sanneh v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 73; [2017] 3 WLR 1486 the Supreme Court held that being a “Zambrano” care…”
- Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…s 26, 37, 91; R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 57; [2015] 1 WLR 3820, para 32; and In Re Brewster [2017] UKSC 8; [2017] 1 WLR 519, paras 50-52.…”
- Considered — Ward & Ors, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Hillingdon & Ors 2019-04-16
“…ification, the court will not have had the benefit of the considered decision of the policy maker. Thus, as Lord Kerr pointed out in Re Brewster [2017] UKSC 8, [2017] 1 WLR 519 at [52]:…”
- Cited — JT v First-Tier Tribunal 2018-07-24
“…ly severe disabilities which required lengthy in-patient hospital treatment (see the Mathieson case), and being a co-habitee (see In Re Brewster [2017] UKSC 8; [2017] 1 WLR 519). On the other hand, in Sanneh v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 73; [2017] 3 WLR 1486 the Supreme Court held that being a “Zambrano” care…”
- Cited — Uber London Ltd & Ors, R (on the application of) v Transport for London 2018-05-25
“… account when imposing the relevant restriction, and which it only developed in response to litigation. This point was made by the Supreme Court in Re Brewster [2017] 1 WLR 519 at [50]:…”