- Cited — Gary James Keane v David Sargen & Ors 2023-02-15
“…n that in cross-examination, as he should have been if Mr Keane’s case had been to the contrary (see e.g. Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67, Markem Corp v Zipher Ltd [2005] RPC 31 and Chen v Ng [2017] UKPC 27). Nor was there any support for the Judge’s finding in the evidence of Mr Beaton, Mr MacGloin or Mr Martin, and, when Mr Beaton an…”
- Cited — Adams v Options UK Personal Pensions LLP 2021-04-01
“…minal conduct on CLP’s part when that was not raised squarely with her in cross-examination (compare e.g. Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 and Markem Corpn v Zipher [2005] RPC 31).…”
- Considered — Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Azima 2021-03-12
“…The question in reality is: what amounts to a proper opportunity? This court considered that question in Markem Corp v Zipher Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 267, [2005] RPC 31. The court referred to the decision of the House of Lords in Browne v Dunn…”
- Cited — Jesudason v Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust 2020-01-31
“…n the subsequent judgment. A relatively recent example of the application of this rule by the English Court of Appeal can be found in Markem Corpn v Zipher Ltd [2005] RPC 31.…”
- Cited — B (A Child) 2018-10-04
“…[2005] RPC 31…”
- Cited — Travel Document Service & Ladbroke Group International v Revenue & Customs (Rev 1) 2018-03-20
“…o contend, or to the FTT to find, that TDS had held the LGI shares for a “unallowable purpose”. In this context, Mr Peacock relied on Markem Corpn v Zipher Ltd [2005] RPC 31, where the Court of Appeal cited from the obscurely-reported decision of the House of Lords in Browne v Dunn (1894) 6 R 67 via an Australian decision, Allied P…”