Home › Cases › [2017] EWCA Civ 1696
[2017] EWCA Civ 1696
· cited by 2 · influence score 14 /100
Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite [2017] EWCA Civ 1696
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment Cited · 2
Citation network [2017] EWCA Civ 1696 B (A Child) Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authorit cited by
Cited by (2) Cited — Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Azima 2021-03-12 “…This court made the same distinction in Howlett v Davis [2017] EWCA Civ 1696,…”
Cited — B (A Child) 2018-10-04 “…ed, and where the challenge could in reality go no further than “I put it to you that you are lying”. As my lord, Lord Justice Newey, put it in Howlett v Davies[2017] EWCA Civ 1696 at [39]:…”
Frequently cited alongside