- Cited — Daniel Richard Jwanczuk v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2023-10-11
“…sue a legitimate aim and do the means employed bear ‘a reasonable relationship of proportionality’ to the aims sought to be realised (see Stec v United Kingdom (2006) 43 EHRR 47, para 51)?”…”
- Cited — Delve & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions 2020-09-15
“…ed the origins of the MWRF test to James v United Kingdom (Appn 8793/79) (1986) 8 EHRR 123, at [46] through Stec v United Kingdom (Appns 65731/01 and 65900/01) (2006) 43 EHRR 47, at [52] and then to Carson at [55] onwards. He referred then to the different path taken by Lord Mance JSC in In re Recovery of Medical Costs for Asbestos Dis…”
- Cited — Drexler, R (On the Application Of) v Leicestershire County Council 2020-04-07
“…That line of authority was in turn based on the decision of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in Stec v United Kingdom (2006) 43 EHRR 47. In that case, after referring to the concept of the “margin of appreciation” which is afforded to Contracting States in the application of the Convention, the…”
- Cited — AR & SXC, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2020-01-29
“…ble with Article 14 ECHR and if there is differential treatment there must be objective justification: in this regard Lewis J referred to Stec v United Kingdom (2006) 43 EHRR 47. Lewis J said that the courts should give due regard to the choice of the legislature where the justification for differential treatment arises out of economic…”
- Cited — Langford v The Secretary of State for Defence 2019-07-17
“…judgment of the national legislature as to what was in the public interest unless it was manifestly without reasonable foundation. And in Stec v United Kingdom (2006) 43 EHRR 47, para 52, which it repeated word for word in Carson v United Kingdom 51 EHRR 13, para 61 the Grand Chamber, addressing complaints of discrimination arising out…”
- Cited — A & Anor. v Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority & Anor. 2018-07-03
“…Stec v United Kingdom (2006) 43 EHRR 47was concerned with limiting conditions relating to additional state benefits payable to people who had to stop working because of injury at work or occupational…”