- Cited — AG (A Child), Re 2022-11-18
“…efore, so far as possible, be interpreted in harmony with other treaties (see Al-Adsani v. United Kingdom (2002) 34 EHRR 11 (Al-Adsani)at [55], Demir v. Turkey (2009) 48 EHRR 54 at [67] and Al-Dulimi v. Switzerland (2016) (5809/08) (Al-Dulimi) at [134]).…”
- Cited — National Union of Professional Foster Carers v The Certification Officer 2021-04-16
“…ted that that constituted an interference with “the right to bargain collectively with the employer”, which was first recognised by the ECtHR in Demir v Turkey (2009) 48 EHRR 54 as “one of the essential elements of the ‘right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of [one’s] interests’ set forth in Article 11 of the Conven…”
- Considered — Independent Workers Union of Great Britain, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy & Ors 2021-02-26
“…Demir and Baykara v Turkey (2009) 48 EHRR 54; [2008] ECR 1345 is the high point of the Appellant’s case. The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) had to consider a case where Turk…”
- Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…ntions, should be taken into account for the purpose of interpreting the European Convention on Human Rights. As stated by the European Court in Demir v Turkey (2009) 48 EHRR 54, at para 85:…”
- Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…e Convention, the purpose of doing so is not to establish whether the respondent state is in breach of its international obligations. Indeed, in Demir v Turkey (2009) 48 EHRR 54, at para 86, the Court expressly rejected an argument that it could not rely in interpreting the Convention in a case against Turkey on international conventio…”
- Cited — AB, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice 2019-01-18
“… Switzerland (2010) 54 EHRR 1087, at [131], quoted approvingly by Lady Hale in ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4; [2011] 2 AC 166, at [21], and Demir v Turkey (2009) 48 EHRR 54, state that the ECHR must be interpreted in harmony with international law. Further, the UNCRC mustbe taken into account when interpreting ECHR rights applicab…”