- Cited — FN (Burundi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-11-16
“…Relying on remarks made by Baroness Hale in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, [2011] 2 AC 166, at paragraphs 34-37, Mr Bazini stressed the importance, where possible, of obtaining the child’s own views when a “best interests” assessment is undertaken. H…”
- Cited — L3 v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022-10-21
“…n to the importance of children being brought up in the country of their citizenship: ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4; [2011] 2 AC 166. There is no reference in SIAC’s judgment to ZH or to the weight to be given to the British citizenship of A’s children.…”
- Cited — L3 v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022-10-21
“…The appellant in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4; [2011] 2 AC 166 arrived in the United Kingdom in 1995. Over the next ten years she made several unsuccessful applications for leave to remain including two asylum claims in fa…”
- Cited — Griffiths v Tickle & Ors 2021-12-10
“…In ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, [2011] 2 AC 166 the Supreme Court made clear that when conducting a balancing exercise in human rights cases a court must treat the best interests of a child as “a primary con…”
- Cited — Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) 2021-02-18
“…In ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4, [2011] 2 AC 166, Lady Hale referred at [32] to “the intrinsic importance of citizenship” and quoted with approval a statement that “the fact of belonging to a country fundamen…”
- Considered — Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) 2021-02-18
“…f section 55 has been considered by the Supreme Court in a number of cases, including ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, [2011] 2 AC 166, Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74, [2013] 1 WLR 3690 and R (MM (Lebanon)) v Secretary of State for Home Affairs [2017] UKSC …”
- Cited — HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) 2020-09-04
“…on and extradition fields has been examined by the Supreme Court in a trio of cases – ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, [2011] 2 AC 166; H (H) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic [2012] UKSC 25, [2013] 1 AC 338; and Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74, [2…”
- Cited — Al M (Children) 2020-02-28
“…[2011] 2 AC 166, para [33]."…”
- Cited — HM Attorney General v Akhter & Ors 2020-02-14
“…that consideration of ECHR rights must be viewed through the prism of Article 3: see: ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, [2011] 2 AC 166, per Baroness Hale at [23];…”
- Followed — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“… affected by the decision include children. The applicable principles, established in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4; [2011] 2 AC 166 and subsequent cases, were summarised as follows by Lord Hodge in Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 74; [2013] 1 WLR 3690, at pa…”
- Cited — AB, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice 2019-01-18
“…rom the Strasbourg Court, such as Neulinger v Switzerland (2010) 54 EHRR 1087, at [131], quoted approvingly by Lady Hale in ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4; [2011] 2 AC 166, at [21], and Demir v Turkey (2009) 48 EHRR 54, state that the ECHR must be interpreted in harmony with international law. Further, the UNCRC mustbe taken into…”
- Cited — Flintshire County Council v Jayes, R. ( On the Application of) 2018-05-15
“…anning decision are not merely a material consideration, as the Supreme Court held in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4; [2011] 2 AC 166) (“ZH (Tanzania)”), they are a “primary” consideration. In coming to that conclusion, the Supreme Court relied upon general principles of international law, in…”
- Explained — Davies v Hertfordshire County Council 2018-03-06
“…onality of interference with rights under article 8 of the Convention as explained in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4; [2011] 2 AC 166; a case concerning immigration and asylum, H (H)v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa (Official Solicitor intervening) [2012] UKSC 25; [2013] 1 AC…”
- Cited — Nixon & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-01-17
“…ll relevant family members, those of children are of particular, primary importance (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4); [2011] 2 AC 166).…”