- Cited — DnaNudge Limited v Ventura Capital GP Limited 2023-10-09
“…[2009] AC 1101 (“…”
- Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department v James Cox & Ors. 2023-05-19
“…[2009] AC 1101 , para 14. And it does so by focussing on the meaning of the relevant words, in this case clause 3(2) of each of the 25 leases, in their documentary, factual a…”
- Cited — Allan John Doyle v M&D Foundation & Building Services Limited 2022-07-08
“…[2009] AC 1101, paras 16-26) should not be invoked to undervalue the importance of the language of the provision which is to be construed. The exercise of interpreting a prov…”
- Cited — Berkeley Square Holdings Ltd & Ors v Lancer Property Asset Management Ltd & Ors 2021-04-15
“…Homes Ltd [2009] UKHL 38, [2009] AC 1101. The Supreme Court concluded that there was no reason why an agreement resulting from without prejudice negotiations should, in this respect, be in any differe…”
- Cited — Bell v Ivy Technology Ltd 2020-11-19
“…e as being subjective evidence of the parties’ intentions or part of the pre-contractual negotiations: see Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] UKHL 38, [2009] AC 1101 at [32]-[41] (Lord Hoffmann). Thirdly, he submitted that, whatever might be revealed by a fuller investigation of the facts, clause 15.12 was crystal clear and…”
- Cited — Apache North Sea Ltd v Euroil Exploration Ltd & Anor 2020-10-30
“…ble to the parties would have understood them to be using the language in the contract to mean", to quote Lord Hoffmann in Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] AC 1101, para 14. And it does so by focussing on the meaning of the relevant words, in this case clause 3(2) of each of the 25 leases, in their documentary, factual an…”
- Cited — Apache North Sea Ltd v Euroil Exploration Ltd & Anor 2020-10-30
“…First, the reliance placed in some cases on commercial common sense and surrounding circumstances (eg in Chartbrook [2009] AC 1101 , paras 16-26) should not be invoked to undervalue the importance of the language of the provision which is to be construed. The exercise of interpreting a pro…”
- Cited — FSHC Group Holdings Ltd v Glas Trust Corporation Ltd (Rev 1) 2019-07-31
“…In Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] UKHL 38; [2009] AC 1101 Lord Hoffmann (in a judgment with which all the other members of the appellate committee of the House of Lords agreed) expressed the view that, where the docum…”
- Doubted — FSHC Group Holdings Ltd v Glas Trust Corporation Ltd (Rev 1) 2019-07-31
“… of the law was thrown into doubt by the observations of Lord Hoffmann on the question of rectification in Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] UKHL 38; [2009] AC 1101.…”
- Cited — Fraser Turner Ltd v Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP & Ors 2019-07-19
“…ble to the parties would have understood them to be using the language in the contract to mean”, to quote Lord Hoffmann in Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] AC 1101 , para 14. And it does so by focussing on the meaning of the relevant words … in their documentary, factual and commercial context. That meaning has to be asse…”
- Cited — Gaia Ventures Ltd v Abbeygate Helical (Leisure Plaza) Ltd 2019-05-14
“…ction of contracts may appear to favour a more literal approach, the basic principles set out in Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] AC 1101 remain definitive. The words are to be given the meaning which the reasonable person, having all the relevant background knowledge available to the parties, wo…”
- Cited — British Telecommunications Plc v BT Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd & Anor 2018-12-04
“…[2009] AC 1101…”
- Cited — Malone v Birmingham Community NHS Trust 2018-06-19
“…lding Society [1998] 1 WLR 896; Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 749; Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] UKHL 38, [2009] AC 1101 and Wood v Capita Insurance Services [2017] UKSC 24; [2017] AC 1173.…”
- Cited — Heis & Ors v Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd & Anor 2018-06-11
“…le to the parties would have understood them to be using the language in the contract to mean”, to quote Lord Hoffmann in Chartbrook Ltd v. Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] AC 1101, para 14. And it does so by focussing on the meaning of the relevant words, in this case clause 3(2) of each of the 25 leases, in their documentary, factual an…”
- Cited — Warborough Investments Ltd v Lunar Office S.A.R.L. 2018-03-13
“…First, the reliance placed in some cases on commercial common sense and surrounding circumstances (e.g. in Chartbrook [2009] AC 1101, paras 16-26) should not be invoked to undervalue the importance of the language of the provision which is to be construed. The exercise of interpreting a prov…”