- Applied — DnaNudge Limited v Ventura Capital GP Limited 2023-10-09
“…In Rainy Sky v Kookmin Bank [2011] 1 WLR 2900 (“Rainy Sky”) at [23], Lord Clarke observed that if the parties have used unambiguous language, the court must apply it. However, this does not mean that the p…”
- Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department v James Cox & Ors. 2023-05-19
“…nk of Credit and Commerce International SA v Ali [2002] 1 AC 251 , para 8, per Lord Bingham of Cornhill; and the survey of more recent authorities in Rainy Sky [2011] 1 WLR 2900, paras 21-30, per Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony JSC.”…”
- Cited — Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment Inc v British Telecommunications PLC 2023-04-26
“…n contractual interpretation was definitively established by the trio of Supreme Court cases on the subject, namely Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50; [2011] 1 WLR 2900, Arnold v Britton and others [2015] UKSC 36; [2015] AC 1619 and Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24; [2017] AC 1173.…”
- Cited — Abdulrahman Bin Abdullah bin Ibrahim Al-Subaihi & Anor. v Mishal Maan Al-Sanea 2022-10-20
“…l principles of contractual construction are non-contentious and to be found in a series of recent cases, including Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50; [2011] 1 WLR 2900 (“Rainy Sky”); Arnold v Britton and others [2015] UKSC 36; [2015] AC 1619 and Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24; [2017] AC 1173 (“Wood v Capi…”
- Approved — Mostyn House Estate Management Company Limited v Barry Youde & Ors. 2022-07-06
“…n Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36, [2015] AC 1619, Wood v Capita Insurance Services [2017] UKSC 24, [2017] AC 1173 and Rainy Sky v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 90, [2011] 1 WLR 2900 to the extent that it is approved in those cases. The principles are now very well known. A convenient summary of those grounding principles can be found at [1…”
- Cited — Vneshprombank LLC v Georgy Ivanovich Bedzhamov 2022-06-24
“…s admissible as relevant evidence in interpreting the guarantee [61] and cited the leading authorities on contractual interpretation: Rainy Sky v. Kookmin Bank [2011] 1 WLR 2900, Arnold v. Britton [2015] AC 1619 and Wood v. Capita Insurance Services Limited [2017] UKSC 24.…”
- Cited — Robert Nicholas Jason Scholfield & Anor. v Matthew David Smith & Anor. 2022-06-21
“…ety [1998] 1 WLR 896 (“ICS”), Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] UKHL 38, [2009] 1 AC 1101 (“Chartbrook”), Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, [2011] 1 WLR 2900, Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36, [2015] AC 1619 and Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24, [2017] AC 1173 (“Wood”). It can be seen from the auth…”
- Cited — Steve Ward Services (UK) Limited v Davies & Davies Associates Limited 2022-02-14
“…[2011] 1 WLR 2900…”
- Cited — Abc Electrification Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd 2020-12-04
“…he well-known general principles of contractual construction are to be found in a series of recent cases, including Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50; [2011] 1 WLR 2900; Arnold v Britton and others [2015] UKSC 36; [2015] AC 1619 and Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24; [2017] AC 1173.…”
- Cited — Apache North Sea Ltd v Euroil Exploration Ltd & Anor 2020-10-30
“…The well-known principles of contractual construction are to be found in a series of recent cases, including Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50; [2011] 1 WLR 2900; Arnold v Britton and others [2015] UKSC 36; [2015] AC 1619 and Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24; [2017] AC 1173. No issue is taken with the…”
- Cited — Primus International Holding Company & Ors v Triumph Controls - UK Ltd & Anor 2020-09-22
“…eed that those principles can be found in the copious recent guidance emanating from the Supreme Court, represented by Rainy Sky v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, [2011] 1 WLR 2900; Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC…”
- Cited — Lamesa Investments Ltd v Cynergy BankLtd 2020-06-30
“…UKSC 50 [2011] 1 WLR 2900…”
- Cited — Lamesa Investments Ltd v Cynergy BankLtd 2020-06-30
“…[2011] 1 WLR 2900…”
- Cited — First National Trustco (UK) Ltd & Anor v McQuitty & Ors 2020-02-05
“…[2011] 1 WLR 2900…”
- Cited — Manchikalapati & Ors v Zurich Insurance Plc (t/a Zurich Building Guarantee & Zurich Municipal) & Ors 2019-12-05
“…[2011] 1 WLR 2900, para 21 per Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony;…”
- Cited — JP Morgan Chase Bank NA v The Federal Republic of Nigeria 2019-10-08
“… analysis appears to me entirely correct. In paragraph 32 he sets out the principles derived from the well-known line of authority: Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] 1 WLR 2900, Arnold v Britton [2015] AC 1619 and Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] AC 1173. The relevance of his discussion in paragraphs 33 and 34 of the presen…”
- Cited — Fraser Turner Ltd v Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP & Ors 2019-07-19
“…r’s judgment in Arnold v. Britton and cited well-known principles and dicta from Wood v. Capita Insurance Services [2017] UKSC 24, Rainy Sky SA v. Kookmin Bank [2011] 1 WLR 2900, Marks & Spencer plc v. BNP Paribas Securities Services [2016] AC 742 at [18]-[21], and BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v. Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 2…”
- Cited — The State of the Netherlands v Deutsche Bank AG 2019-05-02
“…[2011] 1 WLR 2900…”
- Cited — British Telecommunications Plc v BT Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd & Anor 2018-12-04
“…[2011] 1 WLR 2900…”
- Considered — City of York v Trinity One (Leeds) Ltd 2018-08-29
“… coming to that conclusion I have considered the careful guidance given in Arnold v Britton in the context of the guidance given in Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] 1 WLR 2900 with the considerable assistance of the overview provided by Lord Hodge in Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] AC 1173 at [8] to [14].…”
- Cited — PM Law Ltd v Motorplus Ltd 2018-07-26
“…was nothing uncommercial about construing the 2007 Agreement in a way which did not oblige Motorplus to refer a quantity of claims: Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] 1 WLR 2900; [2011] UKSC 50 per Lord Clarke at [41].…”
- Applied — Trillium (Prime) Property GP Ltd v Elmfield Road Ltd 2018-07-04
“…f paragraph 3 to the rent review process. Where the language of a contract is unambiguous, the court must apply it: Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, [2011] 1 WLR 2900 at [23].…”
- Cited — Botleigh Grange Hotel Ltd v HMRC 2018-05-09
“…mited [2017] UKSC 24, [2017] AC 1173 per Lord Hodge in particular at [8] – [15]. Lord Hodge declined to reformulate the guidance in Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] 1 WLR 2900 and Arnold v Britton. However, he described the Court’s task at paragraph [10] as:…”