- Cited — Rashid Maqsood Abbasi & Anor v Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 2023-03-31
“…In re Guardian News and Media and others [2010] UKSC 1; [2010] 2 AC 697 concerned the anonymity of individuals designated by the Treasury as being suspected of facilitating acts of terrorism under the Terrorism (United Nations Meas…”
- Explained — XXX v Camden London Borough Council 2020-11-11
“…in) at paragraph 20. The importance of the press interest in the names of parties was explained by Lord Rodger in Re Guardian News and Media Ltd [2010] UKSC 1; [2010] 2 AC 697 at 723. At paragraph 22 of In re S (a child) the House of Lords affirmed that the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court to restrain publicity was the vehicle…”
- Cited — Moss v Information Commissioner 2020-05-15
“…f parties is important for press scrutiny as, inter alia, it generates public interest: as Lord Roger held at [63] in Re Guardian News and Media Ltd and others [2010] 2 AC 697, “a lot” is in a name.…”
- Cited — Balajigari v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-04-16
“…t article 8 protects a person’s right to their reputation: he referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd [2010] UKSC 1, [2010] 2 AC 697.…”
- Cited — Ali & Anor v Channel 5 Broadcasting Ltd 2019-04-16
“… Claimants, the judge reminded himself of the well-known passage from the judgment of Lord Rodger of Earlsferry in In Re Guardian News and Media [2010] UKSC 1, [2010] 2 AC 697 at paragraph 63 emphasising the importance to the press and other media of naming individuals to focus the attention of the reader or watcher.…”