- Cited — JC Bamford Excavators Limited v Manitou UK Limited & Anor 2023-07-17
“…s in Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) (“Spycatcher”) [1990] 1 AC 109 at 268, Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457 at [13] and Lord Hoffmann in Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No 3) [2007] UKHL 21, [2008] 1 AC 1 at [111].…”
- Cited — Richard Stoute & Anor v News Group Newspapers Limited 2023-05-19
“…In Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457 the model Naomi Campbell succeeded in her claim for misuse of private information in respect of the publication in The Mirror of photographs of herself, and in…”
- Cited — Rashid Maqsood Abbasi & Anor v Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 2023-03-31
“…of the press in the context of the principle of open justice. At [17] he distilled the four propositions which emerged from Campbell v. MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22; [2004] 2 AC 457:…”
- Cited — Griffiths v Tickle & Ors 2021-12-10
“…The four propositions distilled by Lord Steyn in Re S were derived from the earlier decision of the House in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457. There, the House explored the interplay between Articles 8 and 10 in the context of a complaint about press disclosure of the claimant’s drug taking and rehab…”
- Cited — HRH The Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Limited 2021-12-02
“…The judge then cited Lord Hoffmann at [57] in Campbell v. MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 (Campbell), where he said that: “[a] person may attract or even seek publicity about some aspects of his or her life without creating any public interest in th…”
- Cited — Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co Ltd v Celgard, LLC (Rev 1) 2020-10-09
“…s in Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) (“Spycatcher”) [1990] 1 AC 109 at 268, Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457 at [13] and Lord Hoffmann in Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No 3) [2007] UKHL 21, [2008] 1 AC 1 at [111]. (It is not, however, a complete statement of the ingredients o…”
- Cited — The Racing Partnership Ltd & Ors v Sports Information Services Ltd 2020-10-09
“…s in Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) (“Spycatcher”) [1990] 1 AC 109 at 268, Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457 at [13] and Lord Hoffmann in Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No 3) [2007] UKHL 21, [2008] 1 AC 1 at [111]. (It is not, however, a complete statement of the ingredients o…”
- Cited — Moss v Information Commissioner 2020-05-15
“…S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 AC 593 (HL). There Lord Steyn at [17] observed that the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 (HL) had illuminated the interplay between Articles 8 and 10 through four propositions:…”
- Cited — ZXC v Bloomberg LP 2020-05-15
“…The reference to Campbell’s case was to the decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v. Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457.…”
- Cited — Lloyd v Google LLC 2019-10-02
“…[2004] 2 AC 457…”
- Followed — Ali & Anor v Channel 5 Broadcasting Ltd 2019-04-16
“…tion in question, so that the Claimant’s rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights were engaged: see Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457. This is an objective test and the formulation of Lord Hope in Campbell was quoted by the judge as follows:…”
- Doubted — WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc v Various Claimants 2018-10-22
“…f private information, Ms Proops submitted that the common law tort of misuse of private information was only established by Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457, long after the DPA and, even more so, its statutory predecessor the Data Protection Act 1984. We doubt that is a correct analysis since, as Lord Nicholls obse…”
- Cited — Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor v TLU & Anor 2018-06-15
“…Today, as summarised by Lord Nicholls in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22; [2004] 2 AC 457, at [14], the essence of the tort in question is encapsulated as “misuse of private information”; the focus is now on the values underlying privacy. In his spe…”