“…of A’s article 8 rights because there were ‘insufficient safeguards to avoid discrimination and there is a clear risk of arbitrariness (Gillan v United Kingdom (2010) 50 EHRR 45). In addition, at the time of [A’s] alleged actions, deprivation of citizenship was not sufficiently foreseeable (Gillan). The decision is therefore not “in ac…”
“…l proceedings before an independent authority or a court and the existence of the remedy of judicial review may not save the day: see, for example, Gillan v UK (2010) 50 EHRR 45 at para 86. But where the statement as to how a discretion will or may be exercised is as precise as is practicable in all the circumstances, the fact that a d…”