How many times has (2010) 51 EHRR 28 been cited?

(2010) 51 EHRR 28 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

(2010) 51 EHRR 28

· cited by 3 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

(2010) 51 EHRR 28

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…This test has been reiterated by the European Court of Human Rights in later cases: see Carson v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR 13, para 61; Andrejeva v Latvia (2010) 51 EHRR 28, para 81; Stummer v Austria (2012) 54 EHRR 11, paras 81-83; Vrontou v Cyprus (2017) 65 EHRR 31, paras 62-64. It was adopted by the House of Lords in R (RJM) v …”
Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…This statement has been reiterated in later cases: see e.g. Carson v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR 13, para 61; Andrejeva v Latvia (2010) 51 EHRR 28, para 83; Fábián v Hungary [2017] ECHR 744, para 115.…”
Cited — JT v First-Tier Tribunal 2018-07-24
“…This approach has been reiterated by the Grand Chamber in later cases: see Carson v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR 13, para 61; Andrejeva v Latvia (2010) 51 EHRR 28, para 79; Stummer v Austria (2012) 54 EHRR 11, paras 81-83. It was adopted by the House of Lords in R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] U…”