How many times has [2011] 1 FLR 372 been cited?

[2011] 1 FLR 372 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2011] 1 FLR 372

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2011] 1 FLR 372

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Thum v Thum 2018-07-12
“…ct London Ltd and another v SK Slavia Praha-Fotbal AS [2011] 1 WLR 866; UBS AG v Kommunale Wasserke Leipzig GmbH [2010] EWHC 2566 (Comm), [2010] CLC 499; W v W [2011] 1 FLR 372; Aannemingsbedrijf Aertssen NV v VSB Machineverhuur BV (Case C-523-14) [2016] ILPr 16, 387; and MH v MH (Case C-173/16) [2017] ILPr 23, 503.…”
Cited — Thum v Thum 2018-07-12
“…ure was referred to as a “condition defeasant”: Lord Clarke in Re I (A Child) [2010] 1 FLR 361 at paragraph 87: see also Holman J’s decision in Weiner v Weiner [2011] 1 FLR 372.…”