- Cited — Anne Dumbreck Robins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2023-07-28
“…ting to purposive interpretation of a statute is necessary”); Bloomsbury International Ltd v Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2011] UKSC 25, [2011] 1 WLR 1546 at [10] per Lord Mance (“In matters of statutory construction, the statutory purpose and the general scheme by which it is to be put into effect are of central…”
- Cited — Oisin Fanning v The Commissioners for HMRC 2023-03-13
“…In Bloomsbury International Ltd v Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2011] 1 WLR 1546, para 10, Lord Mance JSC stated:…”
- Cited — Ken Power & Anor. v Raheel Shah 2023-03-07
“…far as possible, in a way which best gives effect to that purpose (see Lord Mance in Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority [2011] UKSC 25; [2011] 1 WLR 1546 at [10]; and Lewison LJ in Pollen Estate Trustee Co Ltd v Revenue & Customs Commissioners [2013] EWCA Civ 753; [2013] 1 WLR 3785 at [24]. However, that approac…”
- Applied — FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie 2020-07-29
“…ve regime of the Brussels Convention does not apply. She relies upon the statement of Lord Mance in Bloomsbury International Ltd. v Sea Fish Industry Authority [2011] 1 WLR 1546:…”
- Cited — Jimenez, R. (On the Application of) v The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) 2019-01-31
“…ead as a whole and in its context: see R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2003] 2 AC 687 at [38]; Bloomsbury International Ltd and others v DEFRA [2011] 1 WLR 1546 at [10]. On this basis Mr Mullan submits that we should reject an interpretation of Schedule 36 which gives different powers a different territorial reach and …”