- Cited — Anne Dumbreck Robins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2023-07-28
“…ements as to the correct approach to construing legislation of which we were shown a selection: R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2003] UKHL 13, [2003] 2 AC 687 at [8] per Lord Bingham (“Undue concentration on the minutiae of the enactment may lead the Court to neglect the purpose which Parliament intended to achieve”)…”
- Cited — The Reverend Paul Williamson v The Bishop of London & Ors 2023-04-05
“…[2003] 2 AC 687…”
- Cited — Oisin Fanning v The Commissioners for HMRC 2023-03-13
“…he central importance in interpreting any legislation of identifying its purpose. Two examples will suffice. In R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2003] 2 AC 687, para 8, Lord Bingham of Cornhill said:…”
- Cited — Lee Hudson v Jayne Hathway 2022-12-14
“…e legislators might not have foreseen, if they conform to the policy of the Act in question. In R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2003] UKHL 13, [2003] 2 AC 687 Lord Steyn said at [25]:…”
- Cited — The Gas and Electricity Markets Authority (GEMA) v R (SSE Generation Limited & Ors) (SSE) 2022-11-08
“…asure should not be amended unless it is intended to convey a change of meaning. It was for this reason that in R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2003] 2 AC 687 at page [695] Lord Bingham identified as relevant the "…historical context of the situation which led to its enactment". The task of the Court was to work out …”
- Explained — Christian Peter Candy v The Commissioners for HMRC 2022-11-03
“… the meaning of the words used by Parliament. This was explained by Lord Bingham of Cornhill in R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2003] UKHL 13, [2003] 2 AC 687 at [8]:…”
- Cited — Alexander Gorbachev v Andrey Grigoryevich Guriev 2022-09-30
“…to the purpose of the legislation, which must be derived from its language and context. Thus in R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2003] UKHL 13, [2003] 2 AC 687 Lord Bingham said at [8] that:…”
- Cited — Her Majesty's Customs And Excise v Devon Waste Management Ltd & Ors 2021-04-22
“…of the statute as a whole. That much should be uncontroversial: see Lord Bingham of Cornhill in R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2003] UKHL 13, [2003] 2 AC 687 at [8] cited recently in the context of a taxing statute in HMRC v News Corp UK and another [2021] EWCA Civ 91, [55]. A party does not need to raise such argum…”
- Cited — Privacy International & Ors v Secretary of State for Foreign And Commonwealth Affairs & Ors 2021-03-09
“…sk is, within the permissible bounds of interpretation, to give effect to Parliament’s purpose: R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2003] UKHL 13, [2003] 2 AC 687, at paragraph 8 of the opinion of Lord Bingham. That we have sought to do.…”
- Cited — Eynsham Cricket Club v Revenue & Customs 2021-02-23
“…[2003] 2 AC 687…”
- Explained — Revenue and Customs v News Corp UK & Ireland Ltd 2021-01-28
“…effect to the meaning of the words used by Parliament. As Lord Bingham of Cornhill explained in R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2003] UKHL 13, [2003] 2 AC 687 at paragraph 8:…”
- Cited — Revenue and Customs v News Corp UK & Ireland Ltd 2021-01-28
“…[2003] 2 AC 687…”
- Cited — Irwell Insurance Company Ltd v Watson & Ors 2021-01-22
“…ect that this was not the real intention of Parliament”. On the other hand, as Lord Bingham of Cornhill said in R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2003] 2 AC 687 at [8]:-…”
- Cited — Jimenez, R. (On the Application of) v The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) 2019-01-31
“… the intention of Parliament is to be derived from the terms of the Act read as a whole and in its context: see R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2003] 2 AC 687 at [38]; Bloomsbury International Ltd and others v DEFRA [2011] 1 WLR 1546 at [10]. On this basis Mr Mullan submits that we should reject an interpretation of …”
- Cited — CXF, R (On the Application Of) v Central Bedfordshire Council NHS North Norfolk Clinical Commissioning Group 2018-12-20
“…ment, Transport and the Regions, ex parte Spath Holme Ltd [2001] 2 AC 349, 397 (Lord Nicholls); R v (Quintavalle) Secretary of State for Health [2003] UKHL 13; [2003] 2 AC 687, paras 8 (Lord Bingham) and 21 (Lord Steyn). The governing principle was succinctly stated by Toulson LJ in An Informer v A Chief Constable [2012] EWCA Civ 197…”
- Doubted — Davis v Watford Borough Council 2018-03-21
“…For his part, Mr Paget referred us to the decision of the House of Lords in R (Quintavalle) v Secretary of State for Health [2003] UKHL 13, [2003] 2 AC 687 and in particular to the observation of Lord Steyn at paragraph 21 that “nowadays the shift towards purposive interpretation is not in doubt.” Mr Paget also re…”