- Cited — Adesotu v Lewisham London Borough Council 2019-08-02
“… the ECHR meant that recovery of possession was not a proportionate means of achieving the local authority’s legitimate aims: Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] 2 AC 104.…”
- Applied — Paragon Asra Housing Ltd v Neville 2018-07-26
“…ssion claim (following the Supreme Court’s decision in Manchester City Council v. Pinnock (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2011] 2 AC 104), the defendant sought to enforce the possession order. The claimant applied for judicial review of that decision on the ground that it amounted to a dispropor…”
- Cited — Paragon Asra Housing Ltd v Neville 2018-07-26
“…nchester City Council v. Pinnock (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another intervening) (Nos 1 and 2) [2010] UKSC 45, [2011] UKSC 6, [2011] 2 AC 104, per Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR, giving the judgment of the court, at [52]. This was a possession case in which an article 8 defence was raised. Lord Neub…”
- Cited — Davies v Hertfordshire County Council 2018-03-06
“…esolve any relevant dispute of fact notwithstanding that the defendant has no domestic right to remain. See Manchester County Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45; [2011] 2 AC 104, and Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, [2011] 2AC 186. See further, Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities…”