- Cited — Global 100 Limited v Maria Laleva 2021-12-03
“…no, who argued this aspect of the appeal for Ms Laleva, placed some reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court in Akerman-Livingstone v Aster Communities Ltd[2015] UKSC 15, [2015] AC 1399. That was a case in which the defendant to a possession claim asserted that the claim amounted to discrimination on the ground of disability. T…”
- Cited — Campbell v Advantage Ins 2021-11-15
“…tributory negligence is, like making findings of fact, very much a decision for the trial judge to make, see Booth v White at paragraph 20. In Jackson v Murray [2015] UKSC 15; [2015] AC 1399the Supreme Court emphasised the limited basis on which a Court of Appeal could interfere with the trial judge’s apportionment of responsibility…”
- Cited — Adesotu v Lewisham London Borough Council 2019-08-02
“…one hand and a claim of discrimination contrary to the Equality Act 2010 on the other: see per Lord Neuberger PSC in Aster Communities Ltd v AkermanLivingstone [2015] UKSC 15; [2015] AC 1399 at [57].…”
- Approved — Z & Aanor, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Hackney & Anor 2019-06-27
“…In Akerman-Livingstone v Aster Communities Ltd [2015] UKSC 15, [2015] AC 1399 Lady Hale at [28] approved Mummery LJ’s explanation of the relevant questions:…”
- Cited — Powell v Dacorum Borough Council 2019-01-24
“…(The reference to “Aster Communities” is to Aster Communities Ltd. v AkermanLivingstone [2015] UKSC 15.)…”
- Considered — Paragon Asra Housing Ltd v Neville 2018-07-26
“…‘6. … Those provisions were considered recently by the Supreme Court in the case of Akerman-Livingston v. Aster Communities Limited [2015] UKSC 15, [2015] AC 1399. The leading speech was given by Lady Hale, and paragraphs 15 to 19 inclusive of that speech are to be treated as incorporated in this judgment…”
- Cited — Paragon Asra Housing Ltd v Neville 2018-07-26
“…n assessment of whether the execution of the warrant would be discriminatory. The decision of the Supreme Court in Aster Communities Ltd v. Akerman-Livingstone [2015] UKSC 15, [2015] AC 1399 was not authority to the contrary effect.…”