- Applied — The Commissioners for HMRC v Atholl House Productions Limited 2022-04-26
“…use and the BBC, the FTT accepted Atholl House’s submission that, applying the approach set out by the Supreme Court in Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 41, [2011] ICR 1157 (Autoclenz) and based on the evidence it had heard, clause 8 of part B of the contracts did not reflect the terms of the actual agreement between the parties. …”
- Cited — The Commissioners for HMRC v Atholl House Productions Limited 2022-04-26
“…of employment” (see [2009] EWCA Civ 1046; [2010] IRLR 70 at [11]), which Lord Clarke repeated with approval on appeal to the Supreme Court: see [2011] UKSC 41; [2011] ICR 1157. The nature and content of the test was not in issue.…”
- Followed — Addison Lee Ltd v Lange & Ors 2021-04-22
“…The Supreme Court in Uber followed its previous decision in Autoclenz v Belcher [2011] ICR 1157. It held that in determining whether a claimant such as a minicab driver is a limb b worker the court is interpreting a statute rather than interpreting a cont…”
- Applied — Uber B.V. ("UBV") & Ors v Aslam & Ors 2018-12-19
“…the relationship between the drivers and Uber, specifically ULL, set out in the written contractual documents. Applying Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 41, [2011] ICR 1157, the ET had to determine what was the true agreement between the drivers and ULL. In so doing it was important for the ET to have regard to the reality of the …”
- Cited — Uber B.V. ("UBV") & Ors v Aslam & Ors 2018-12-19
“…egativing any agreement to perform services for ULL can be disregarded in accordance with the principles established in Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 41, [2011] ICR 1157.…”