- Applied — The Commissioners for HMRC v Atholl House Productions Limited 2022-04-26
“…etween Atholl House and the BBC, the FTT accepted Atholl House’s submission that, applying the approach set out by the Supreme Court in Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 41, [2011] ICR 1157 (Autoclenz) and based on the evidence it had heard, clause 8 of part B of the contracts did not reflect the terms of the actual agreement betw…”
- Cited — The Commissioners for HMRC v Atholl House Productions Limited 2022-04-26
“…n of a contract of employment” (see [2009] EWCA Civ 1046; [2010] IRLR 70 at [11]), which Lord Clarke repeated with approval on appeal to the Supreme Court: see [2011] UKSC 41; [2011] ICR 1157. The nature and content of the test was not in issue.…”
- Applied — Uber B.V. ("UBV") & Ors v Aslam & Ors 2018-12-19
“…acterisation of the relationship between the drivers and Uber, specifically ULL, set out in the written contractual documents. Applying Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 41, [2011] ICR 1157, the ET had to determine what was the true agreement between the drivers and ULL. In so doing it was important for the ET to have regard to th…”
- Cited — Uber B.V. ("UBV") & Ors v Aslam & Ors 2018-12-19
“… the Agreement negativing any agreement to perform services for ULL can be disregarded in accordance with the principles established in Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 41, [2011] ICR 1157.…”