- Applied — JZ v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors. 2023-02-22
“…l of the Claimant’s delay in making the Part 18 application, and this delay has led, overall, to delay in the proceedings being concluded; and (iv) M v Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 at [58]–[65], on which the Claimant relies, does not assist as this relates to the principles to be applied where a claim is settled in the Administrative Cour…”
- Cited — Tradition Financial Services Ltd v Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors 2023-02-10
“…In R (M) v Croydon LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 595, [2012] 1 WLR 2607 Lord Neuberger MR differentiated between cases where the claimant had achieved all the relief that he sought, and cases in which the claiman…”
- Applied — THE KING on the application of MH (ERITREA) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT 2022-10-10
“…n issue in most such cases is what approach the Court should take to the underlying merits of the claim. The leading case is M v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 595; [2012] 1 WLR 2607. In that case, Lord Neuberger first considered the position in private law litigation. He then applied those principles to applications for …”
- Cited — Mostafa Shahi v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-11-16
“…d conceded the relief sought. In this case it was provided by an order of the court. The Secretary of State also referred to M v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] EWCA (Civ) 595 (paragraph 59). The Court of Appeal had made it clear that a claimant would ordinarily be entitled to his costs if he obtained all the relief he sought by cons…”
- Cited — Mostafa Shahi v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-11-16
“…ess for the purposes of the general rule in CPR Part 44.2’. He added that this was a case which was in the third category in M v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] EWCA (Civ) 595. It was not possible to say who was the successful party and there should be no order for costs.…”
- Cited — M Sport Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Her Majesty's Revenue And Customs 2021-04-16
“…achieved without issuing proceedings, the case fell within the second category of case identified by Lord Neuberger MR in R(M) v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 595, [2012] 1 WLR 2607 at [60].…”
- Cited — Parveen, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Redbridge 2020-03-12
“…l of the relief which she sought, and that she should have been awarded her costs in accordance with the guidance set out in M v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 595, [2012] 1 WLR 2607. The judge, Mr Steven Kovats QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge), ruled that it was impossible, without conducting a full trial of the…”
- Not followed — Archer, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs 2019-06-18
“…t practice was not followed” meant that the outcome of the claim had to be placed in the first category of case identified in M v Croydon London BoroughCouncil [2012] EWCA Civ 595, [2012] LGR 822, that is to say “a case where a claimant has been wholly successful following a contested hearing or pursuant to a settlement”, and where “it i…”
- Cited — Faqiri, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-02-18
“…to a public law claim in the Administrative Court as much as to a claim made in any other part of the justice system (see R (M) v Croydon LondonBorough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 595 at [58] per Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR). Therefore, where someone challenges the decision of an arm of government, and is successful, he can expect to obt…”
- Considered — Rahman, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-07-06
“…This court considered the application of the general costs rules in the public law context in R (M) v Croydon London Borough Council[2012] EWCA Civ 595; [2012] 1 WLR 2607. At [44]-[46], Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR (with whom Hallett and Stanley Burnton LJJ agreed) identified three general principles which …”
- Cited — Sirketi v Kupeli & Ors 2018-05-31
“…sts of the successful party”, CPR rule 44.2(2)(a) represents the prima facie or starting position (M v The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595; [2012] 1 WLR 2607 at [45] per Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR).…”
- Cited — ZN (Afghanistan) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-05-11
“…visions on costs in Part 44 of the Civil Procedure Rules (“CPR”) and the decision of this Court in R (on the application of M) v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 595; [2012] 1 WLR 2607.…”
- Cited — ZN (Afghanistan) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-05-11
“…can in principle be relevant. This accords with the third principle stated by Lord Neuberger MR in R (on the application of M) v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 595; [2012] 1 WLR 2607 at para. 47. I agree that section 30(1) of LASPO does not establish an absolute rule that this fact must always be ignored. As Singh LJ note…”
- Considered — AA (Pakistan), R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-05-01
“…e on 4th April 2015. Hickinbottom LJ then dealt further with the process. He noted that the appeal had become empty. He considered cases such as Mv Croydon LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 595, and decided that the appropriate order to make was that there be no order as to costs, save that Hickinbottom LJ took the view that the Secretary of State had…”
- Cited — Fayad, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-01-31
“… or time for the court. As this was a public law claim, the approach was informed by the principles set out by this court in M v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 595; [2012] 1 WLR 2607. Giving the substantive judgment of the court, at [60], Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR drew a distinction between three types of case, name…”
- Cited — SM (Afghanistan) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-01-24
“… the question of costs and invited further submissions setting out which of the three categories identified by this Court in M v Croydon LBC [2012] 1 WLR 2607, [2012] EWCA Civ 595 (Lord Neuberger MR, and Hallett and Stanley Burnton LJJ) was applicable.…”
- Considered — Nwankwo & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-01-12
“… of that test in the context of costs orders. In my view sufficient guidance has already been given by this Court in the well-known case of R (M) v Croydon LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 595; [2012] 1 WLR 2607, in which this Court considered how applications for costs should be dealt with in judicial review proceedings, particularly where a case ha…”
- Cited — Nwankwo & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-01-12
“…[2012] EWCA Civ 595 in that the Applicant did obtain the remedy sought, but equally the pre-action protocol letter was sent to an incorrect address. Part of the claim was conceded…”