- Applied — Foreign and Commonwealth Office & Ors v Bamieh 2019-05-09
“…In Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Ltd [2012] UKSC 1; [2012] ICR 389, it was held that s.94(1) applied to an employee who lived in Great Britain but travelled to and from his employment in Libya where he worked for 28 days at a …”
- Cited — Seahorse Maritime Ltd v Nautilus International 2018-12-13
“…ecretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (no. 2)[2011] UKSC 36, [2011] ICR 1312, and Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing & Services Ltd[2012] UKSC 1, [2012] ICR 389. For present purposes it is enough to say that the governing principle is that Parliament must be taken to have intended that in the generality of cases the ri…”
- Cited — The British Council v Jeffery & Ors 2018-10-16
“…retary of State for Children, Schools and Families (no. 2) [2011] UKSC 36, [2011] ICR 1312; and Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing & Services Ltd [2012] UKSC 1, [2012] ICR 389. The effect of those decisions has been fairly recently reviewed in this Court in Bates van Winkelhof v Clyde & Co LLP [2012] EWCA Civ 1207, [2013] ICR 883, an…”
- Cited — The British Council v Jeffery & Ors 2018-10-16
“…ls within the territorial scope of section 94(1) of the 1999 Act, should be treated as a question of law with the statement by Lord Hope in Ravat v Halliburton [2012] ICR 389 at 400 C-E that the question, whether the connection between the circumstances of an employee’s employment and Great Britain is sufficiently strong to enable i…”