- Cited — Alexander Gorbachev v Andrey Grigoryevich Guriev 2022-09-30
“… Sabah v Grupo Torras SA [2005] UKPC 1, [2005] 2 AC 333, para 13, per Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe for the Privy Council; Lawson v Serco Limited [2006] UKHL 3, [2006] ICR 250, para 6, per Lord Hoffmann; Agassi v Robinson (Inspector of Taxes) [2006] UKHL 23, [2006] 1 WLR 1380, paras 16, 20, per Lord Scott of Foscote and Lord Walker o…”
- Cited — Turani & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-03-15
“…territory to which it extends: R (XH and AI) v SSHD [2018] QB 355, (Sir Terence Etherton MR at [97]). See to the same effect: Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] UKHL 3, [2006] ICR 250. With that general principle in mind, the interpretive exercise requires “an inquiry to be made as to the person with respect to whom Parliament is presumed, i…”
- Cited — Foreign and Commonwealth Office & Ors v Bamieh 2019-05-09
“…ad a “somewhat chequered history” and was subsequently repealed, leaving the territorial ambit of the ERA entirely to the Courts: Lawson v Serco [2006] UKHL 3; [2006] ICR 250, at [7] – [8]; Jeffery v British Council [2018] EWCA Civ 2253; [2019] IRLR 123, at [2(1)].…”
- Cited — Seahorse Maritime Ltd v Nautilus International 2018-12-13
“…are enjoyed by employees working outside Great Britain. The main authorities start with the decision of the House of Lords in Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] UKHL 3, [2006] ICR 250, but the principles there established were further expounded in the subsequent decisions of the Supreme Court in Duncombe v Secretary of State for Children, Sc…”
- Cited — The British Council v Jeffery & Ors 2018-10-16
“…rs and has produced a plethora of reported cases, including one decision of the House of Lords and two of the Supreme Court – Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] UKHL 3, [2006] ICR 250; Duncombe v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (no. 2) [2011] UKSC 36, [2011] ICR 1312; and Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing & Services Ltd…”
- Cited — The British Council v Jeffery & Ors 2018-10-16
“…For my part I do not find it altogether easy to reconcile the statement by Lord Hoffmann in paragraph 30 of Lawson v Serco [2006] ICR 250 that the question, whether on given facts a case falls within the territorial scope of section 94(1) of the 1999 Act, should be treated as a question of law wi…”
- Cited — Orexim Trading Ltd v Mahavir Port And Terminal Private Ltd & Ano 2018-07-13
“…But few statutes are as explicit as this. In Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] UKHL 3, [2006] ICR 250 the question was whether persons employed and working abroad were entitled to the benefit of the Employment Rights Act 1996. That was a question of interpretat…”