Home › Cases › [2012] STC 23
[2012] STC 23
· cited by 2 · influence score 13 /100
Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite [2012] STC 23
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment Cited · 2
Citation network [2012] STC 23 Revenue and Customs v News Corp UK Eynsham Cricket Club v Revenue & C cited by
Cited by (2) Cited — Eynsham Cricket Club v Revenue & Customs 2021-02-23 “… services” or the “existence of distortion of competition” in order to show a breach of this principle: see Rank Group plc v HMRC (Cases C – 259/10 and 260/10) [2012] STC 23 at [32] to [36].…”
Cited — Revenue and Customs v News Corp UK & Ireland Ltd 2021-01-28 “…260/10) [2011] ECR I-10947, [2012] STC 23. News UK contend that the FTT’s decision to the contrary on this point is wrong in law.…”
Frequently cited alongside