- Cited — MXX v A Secondary School 2023-08-25
“…al connection (i e that the ‘but for’ causation test is satisfied) is not sufficient in itself to satisfy the test. Cases such as Lister and Christian Brothers [2013] 2 AC 1 show that sexual abuse of a child by someone who is employed or authorised to look after the child will, at least generally, satisfy the test. But, as establis…”
- Cited — Iris Hughes v Rajendra Rattan 2022-02-04
“…contractors. She went on to cite from the judgment of Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers PSC in Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society[2012] UKSC 56, [2013] 2 AC 1, generally known as the Christian Brothers case. Lord Phillips identified at [35] the policy reasons that usually make it fair, just and reasonable to impose v…”
- Applied — Barry Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses v BXB 2021-03-15
“…“As Lord Phillips noted in Catholic Child Welfare Society [2013] 2 AC 1, paras 83 and 85, the close connection test has been applied differently in cases concerned with the sexual abuse of children. Instead, the courts have emphasi…”
- Considered — Group Seven Ltd & Anor v Notable Services LLP & Anor (Rev 2) 2019-04-11
“…yer/employee situation which Lord Phillips PSC (with whom the other members of the court agreed) set out at [35] of his judgment in the Christian Brothers case [2013] 2 AC 1, Lord Reed considered three of those factors, in particular, at [23] and [24]. They were the fact that (1) the tort will have been committed as a result of act…”
- Cited — Winter v Hockley Mint Ltd 2018-11-15
“…dern law of vicarious liability in all cases, as set out in the judgment of Lord Phillips in Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society [2012] UKSC 56, [2013] 2 AC 1, as it was interpreted by Lord Reed in Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10, [2016] AC 660, at [24, the Judge’s decision was wrong because the requisite tw…”
- Cited — Kafagi v JBW Group Ltd 2018-05-18
“…e main authorities to which it is necessary to refer is the decision of the Supreme Court in Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society [2012] UKSC 56; [2013] 2 AC 1. That case is sometimes called the “Christian Brothers” case and concerned an institute which was a lay Roman Catholic Order, whose mission was to provide a Ch…”
- Cited — Kafagi v JBW Group Ltd 2018-05-18
“…“Lord Phillips's analysis in the Christian Brothers case [2013] 2 AC 1 wove together these related ideas so as to develop a modern theory of vicarious liability. The result of this approach is that a relationship other than one of…”