- Cited — MXX v A Secondary School 2023-08-25
“…In Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10 (“Cox”) Lord Reed at para 24 described Lord Phillips’ analysis in Christian Brothers as developing a modern theory of vicarious liability. Lord Reed stated:…”
- Followed — Iris Hughes v Rajendra Rattan 2022-02-04
“…The judge cited the summary by Lord Reed JSC in Cox v Ministry of Justice[2016] UKSC 10; [2016] AC 660 of the approach of Lord Phillips in the Christian Brothers case as follows:-…”
- Considered — Andrew Chell v Tarmac Cement and Lime Limited 2022-01-12
“…e he was not acting in the course of his employment in doing what he did. The judge considered a number of authorities which included: Cox v Ministry of Justice[2016] UKSC 10, Muhamud v WM Morrisons Supermarkets plc[2016] UKSC 11, Lister v Hesley Hall Limited[2001] UKHL 22 and Graham v Commercial Bodyworks Limited [2015] EWCA Civ 47…”
- Cited — Barry Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses v BXB 2021-03-15
“…Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10 (“Cox”)…”
- Applied — Anderson & Ors v Sense Network Ltd 2019-07-31
“…ndividual Midas advisors in recommending investment in the scheme. They submitted that, applying the decision of the Supreme Court in Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10, [2016] AC 660, Sense created the risk of such tortious acts by entering into the AR Agreement and thereby exempting Midas from obtaining authorisation from th…”
- Cited — Winter v Hockley Mint Ltd 2018-11-15
“…d Phillips in Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society [2012] UKSC 56, [2013] 2 AC 1, as it was interpreted by Lord Reed in Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10, [2016] AC 660, at [24, the Judge’s decision was wrong because the requisite two stage test is not satisfied in the circumstances of this case.…”
- Considered — Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants 2018-07-17
“…The judge went on to consider the recent decisions of the Supreme Court in two linked cases: Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10, and Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc [2016] UKSC 11. She reviewed the judgment of Lord Reed in Cox, quoting extensively from that case, and considered a…”
- Cited — Unite the Union v Nailard 2018-05-24
“…[2016] UKSC 10 [2016] AC 660 (p. 664 D-E).…”
- Cited — Kafagi v JBW Group Ltd 2018-05-18
“…“In the light of the decision in E G Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10 the question of whether a tortfeasor was an employee or an independent contractor can no longer be regarded as dispositive of vicarious liability. Attention ne…”
- Considered — Kafagi v JBW Group Ltd 2018-05-18
“…These principles were next considered by the Supreme Court in Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10; [2016] AC 660. In that case the claimant worked as the catering manager in a prison. She was moving supplies with the help of prisoners who were on prison ser…”
- Applied — Frederick & Ors v Positive Solutions (Financial Services) Ltd 2018-03-13
“…ppeal in relation to the issue of vicarious liability were that the Master had erred in applying the decision of the Supreme Court in Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10, which it was contended by the respondent had no application to the question of vicarious liability for an agent. At [22] the Judge cited [15] of the judgment …”
- Cited — Frederick & Ors v Positive Solutions (Financial Services) Ltd 2018-03-13
“…tach as a result of having misunderstood or mis-stated the guidance in Christian Brothers [2012] UKSC 56 as re-stated by Lord Reed in Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10;…”
- Cited — Frederick & Ors v Positive Solutions (Financial Services) Ltd 2018-03-13
“…that the Judge ought to have found that the decision in Cox vMinistry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10 was not relevant;…”