- Cited — Nokia Technologies OY & Anor. v OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co, Ltd & Ors. 2022-07-11
“…For this purpose the court must have regard to the totality of the dispute between the parties: see VTB Capital Plc v Nutritek International Corp [2013] UKSC 5,[2013] 2 AC 337 at [57] (Lord Mance), [90]-[91] (Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury) and [192]-[193] (Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony).…”
- Cited — Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd & Ors. v LG Display Co. Ltd & Anor. 2022-04-01
“…lained in such well-known cases as Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460 and VTB Capital Plc v Nutritek International Corpn [2013] UKSC 5, [2013] 2 AC 337, this means that the burden is on the claimant to satisfy the court that England is clearly the appropriate forum for the claim.…”
- Cited — Zayn Al-Abidin Muhammad Husayn v The Foreign and Commonwealth Office 2022-03-16
“…a number of cases. It is sufficient at this stage to refer to the decision of the Supreme Court in VTB Capital Plc v Nutritek International Corpn[2013] UKSC 5, [2013] 2 AC 337. The fullest treatment of the issue is contained in the judgment of Lord Clarke, who said:…”
- Cited — Walter Tzvi Soriano v Forensic News LLC & Ors. 2021-12-21
“…[2013] 2 AC 337 [44] (Lord Mance).…”
- Cited — Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co Ltd v Celgard, LLC (Rev 1) 2020-10-09
“…a serious issue to be tried, and it did not lie on Senior to show that there was no such issue: see VTB Capital pc v Nutritek International Corp [2013] UKSC 5, [2013] 2 AC 337 at [90] (Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury).…”
- Doubted — Rossendale Borough Council v Hurstwood Properties (A) Ltd & Ors 2019-03-07
“…Lord Neuberger, who in VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corporation [2013] UKSC 5, [2013] 2 AC 337 had doubted the existence of any principle permitting the courts to disregard the separate legal personality of a company, accepted that the principle existed …”
- Cited — Eurasia Sports Ltd v Aguad 2018-07-24
“… judge: Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460 at 486C. That principle was recently re-emphasised in VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corp [2013] 2 AC 337 at [69], [93]-[94] [156], [191] and [229].…”
- Cited — Iiyama (UK) Limited & Ors. v Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. & Ors. 2018-02-16
“…The correctness of these principles was accepted when the case went to the Supreme Court: see [2013] UKSC 5, [2013] 2 AC 337, at [199] per Lord Clarke of Stone-cumEbony JSC. Lord Clarke added (ibid.) that “two further and important points emerged” from one of the four cases from whic…”
- Considered — Okpabi & Ors v Royal Dutch Shell Plc & Anor (Rev 1) 2018-02-14
“…The issue was considered by Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury in VTB Capital plc v. Nutritek International Corp [2013] 2 AC 337:…”