- Cited — Graham Michael Wildin v Forest of Dean District Council 2021-11-04
“…[2013] UKSC 34; [2013] 2 AC 415 at [44]:…”
- Approved — Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Azima 2021-03-12
“…urt to draw an inference in that party’s favour. If any inference is to be drawn it should be drawn against him: Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34, [2013] 2 AC 415, approving R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p TC Coombs & Co [1991] 2 AC 283.…”
- Cited — JSC VTB Bank v Skurikhin & Ors 2020-10-21
“…pany receives assets for no consideration and, on proper analysis, as nominee for or on trust for the shareholder. As Lord Sumption recognised in Prest v Prest [2013] 2 AC 415 at [52]:…”
- Cited — Mackenzie v Alcoa Manufacturing (Gb) Ltd 2019-11-29
“…In Petrodel Resources Limited v Prest [2013] UKSC 34; [2013] 2 AC 415 Lord Sumption commented on BRB v Herrington at paragraph 44 noting that the courts had recoiled from parts of the statement in Herrington recording they might …”
- Cited — Leon v Her Majesty's Attorney General & Ors 2019-11-22
“…ercing of the corporate veil which could not be justified, having regard to the decision of the Supreme Court in Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34, [2013] 2 AC 415. Mr Butler did, however, place some reliance on Mr Leon’s ownership of Frinton and hence his “ultimate ownership” of the Lease as a factor supporting the makin…”
- Cited — Moher v Moher 2019-08-21
“…I propose, finally on this topic, to refer to Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd and others [2013] 2 AC 415 which dealt with the issue of inferences which can be drawn from a failure to provide disclosure or to co-operate with the proceedings in the context of the be…”
- Cited — The Crown Prosecution Service v Aquila Advisory Ltd 2019-04-09
“…ers had procured the company's express consent in their capacity as its sole directors or shareholders: see Petrodel Resources Ltd v Prest [2013] 4 All ER 673, [2013] 2 AC 415 (at [41]). As Lord Browne-Wilkinson put it in R v Gomez [1993] 1 All ER 1 at 40, [1993] AC 442 at 496–497:…”
- Applied — Rossendale Borough Council v Hurstwood Properties (A) Ltd & Ors 2019-03-07
“…t question “whether there is an arguable case that the principles stated in the decision of the Supreme Court in Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34, [2013] 2 AC 415 (Prest) concerning the piercing of the corporate veil are capable of application, or principled development, so as to apply to a situation in which an actor di…”
- Cited — Hart v Hart 2018-05-11
“…Armstrong referred to a number of authorities: Westminster Bank Ltd v Edwards [1942] AC 529; Heyting v Dupont [1963] 1 WLR 1192; Petrodel Resources Ltd v Prest [2013] 2 AC 415; In re H (Children)(Care Proceedings: Appeals out of Time) [2015] 1 WLR 5085; and Goyal v Goyal [2016] 4 WLR 140.…”
- Cited — Hart v Hart 2018-05-11
“…e court in this case having no substantive power to make orders in respect of a company’s property or assets under the 1973 Act: Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] 2 AC 415. The circumstances of that case were very different from those in this case. Here the husband was being required to deliver up documents, which he had no right…”
- Applied — Kerman v Akhmedova 2018-02-27
“…of the High Court. It is not some legal Alsatia where the common law and equity do not apply.” And in Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd and others [2013] UKSC 34, [2013] 2 AC 415, para 37, Lord Sumption JSC observed that “Courts exercising family jurisdiction do not occupy a desert island in which general legal concepts are suspended or…”
- Cited — Easynet Global Services Ltd, Re 2018-01-18
“…In Prest v Petrodel Resources Limited [2013] 2 AC 415, [2013] UKSC 34 Lord Sumption, in paragraph 28 of his judgment, had described the term “sham” as “protean” – although the term “sham” is in practice well enoug…”