- Cited — Goddard-Watts v Goddard-Watts 2023-02-15
“… non-disclosure in financial remedy proceedings. Whilst the Family Division is not a legal island with its own laws and principles, (Prest v Petrodel Resources [2013] UKSC 34, per Lord Sumption at [37]), it is relevant to observe the differences that do exist between family proceedings and ordinary civil proceedings; see Wyatt v Vin…”
- Cited — Graham Michael Wildin v Forest of Dean District Council 2021-11-04
“…[2013] UKSC 34; [2013] 2 AC 415 at [44]:…”
- Approved — Ras Al Khaimah Investment Authority v Azima 2021-03-12
“…inciple for a court to draw an inference in that party’s favour. If any inference is to be drawn it should be drawn against him: Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34, [2013] 2 AC 415, approving R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p TC Coombs & Co [1991] 2 AC 283.…”
- Cited — Mackenzie v Alcoa Manufacturing (Gb) Ltd 2019-11-29
“…In Petrodel Resources Limited v Prest [2013] UKSC 34; [2013] 2 AC 415 Lord Sumption commented on BRB v Herrington at paragraph 44 noting that the courts had recoiled from parts of the statement in Herrington reco…”
- Cited — Leon v Her Majesty's Attorney General & Ors 2019-11-22
“…ily involve a piercing of the corporate veil which could not be justified, having regard to the decision of the Supreme Court in Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34, [2013] 2 AC 415. Mr Butler did, however, place some reliance on Mr Leon’s ownership of Frinton and hence his “ultimate ownership” of the Lease as a factor sup…”
- Applied — Rossendale Borough Council v Hurstwood Properties (A) Ltd & Ors 2019-03-07
“…e as the relevant question “whether there is an arguable case that the principles stated in the decision of the Supreme Court in Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [2013] UKSC 34, [2013] 2 AC 415 (Prest) concerning the piercing of the corporate veil are capable of application, or principled development, so as to apply to a situation in …”
- Applied — Kerman v Akhmedova 2018-02-27
“…ivision is part of the High Court. It is not some legal Alsatia where the common law and equity do not apply.” And in Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd and others [2013] UKSC 34, [2013] 2 AC 415, para 37, Lord Sumption JSC observed that “Courts exercising family jurisdiction do not occupy a desert island in which general legal concepts…”
- Cited — Easynet Global Services Ltd, Re 2018-01-18
“…In Prest v Petrodel Resources Limited [2013] 2 AC 415, [2013] UKSC 34 Lord Sumption, in paragraph 28 of his judgment, had described the term “sham” as “protean” – although the term “sham” is in practice well enough understood and…”