- Cited — Anne Dumbreck Robins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2023-07-28
“…e statutory purpose and the general scheme by which it is to be put into effect are of central importance”); Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2014] UKSC 10, [2014] AC 1189 at [72] per Lord Neuberger PSC (“The fact that context and mischief are factors which must be taken into account does not mean that, when performing its interp…”
- Cited — Kenneth Davies v Stephen Ford & Ors. 2023-02-17
“…consequence that Mr Davies’ claims against GBRK were subject to a six-year limitation period: see [353], and Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2014] UKSC 10, [2014] AC 1189.…”
- Applied — Tradition Financial Services Ltd v Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors 2023-02-10
“…reach of fiduciary duty is entitled to the benefit of a six year limitation period, unlike a true fiduciary: Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2014] UKSC 10, [2014] AC 1189. There are good policy reasons, he said, why true fiduciaries should be liable for fraudulent breaches of trust without limit of time, which do not apply to di…”
- Cited — TIDAL LAGOON (SWANSEA BAY) PLC v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR BUSINESS, ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 2022-12-01
“…[2014] UKSC 10, [2014] AC 1189 per Lord Neuberger at [72], and…”
- Cited — Mark Byers v The Saudi National Bank 2022-01-27
“… knowing recipient will have been subject to “custodial duties” also finds support in other recent cases. In Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2014] UKSC 10, [2014] AC 1189 (“Williams”), Lord Sumption (with whom Lord Hughes agreed) said in paragraph 31:…”
- Cited — The Queen (on the application of D4) (notice of deprivation of citizenship) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2022-01-26
“…ssible within an exercise of statutory interpretation, I note this passage from Lord Neuberger’s judgment in Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2014] UKSC 10; [2014] AC 1189 at [72]:…”
- Applied — Rashid v Nasrullah 2018-11-29
“…e fiduciaries. A dishonest assister is entitled to rely on the six-year limitation period in section 21 (3): Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2014] UKSC 10, [2014] AC 1189. On the face of it, therefore, section 21 does not apply either to MR1 or to Mr Farakh Rashid. If, therefore, MR2 retained an equitable interest in the land, h…”