“…re determined in the state where they were habitually resident before the abduction”: Re K (A Child) (Reunite International Child Abduction Centre intervening) [2014] AC 1401, at [57].…”
“… in the state where they were habitually resident before the abduction”: Lady Hale in Re K (A Child) (Reunite International Child Abduction Centre intervening) [2014] AC 1401, at [57]. Further, as Lord Hughes said in In re C, at [3], after referring to the preamble and Article 1 (see below): “The general scheme of the Convention is …”
“… in the state where they were habitually resident before the abduction”: Lady Hale in Re K (A Child) (Reunite International Child Abduction Centre intervening) [2014] AC 1401, at [57]. And consistent with Lord Hughes’ observation in In re C, at [3], that: “The general scheme of the Convention is to enable a left-behind parent to mak…”