- Cited — J (Children: Reopening Findings of Fact) 2023-04-28
“…nce) [1997] 2 All ER 29, [1997] Fam 117, [1997] 1 FLR 285, [1997] 3 WLR 1 and Munby P in Re Z (Children) (Care Proceedings: Review of Findings), [2014] EWFC 9, [2015] 1 WLR 95, [2014] All ER (D) 143.…”
- Cited — CTD (A Child: Rehearing) 2020-10-14
“…am City Council v H (No. 1)[2005] EWHC 2885 (Fam)(Charles J); Birmingham City Council v H (No. 2) [2006] EWHC 3062 (Fam) (McFarlane J); and Re ZZ[2014] EWFC 9; [2015] 1 WLR 95 (Sir James Munby P). These establish that at the first stage the applicant must show that there are solid grounds for believing that a rehearing will result in…”
- Cited — B (A Child), Re (Abduction: Article 13(B)) 2020-08-11
“…This process can be gleaned from In re Z (Children) (Care Proceedings: Review of Findings); Practice Note [2015] 1 WLR 95 and Re E (Children: Reopening Findings of Fact) [2020] 1 FLR 162.…”
- Cited — Re W (A Child) 2018-08-15
“…including in the High Court, to set aside findings and order a rehearing in children proceedings: see In re Z (Children) (Care Proceedings: Review of Findings) [2015] 1 WLR 95. This is in part based on what Sir Stephen Brown P said in W v Ealing London Borough Council [1993] 2 FLR 788, 794 G/H:…”
- Considered — In the matter of R-E (Children) 2018-05-01
“…or the Local Authority referred to the three-stage test set out by Sir James Munby P. in In re Z (Children)(Care Proceedings: Review of Findings) Practice Note [2015] 1 WLR 95 and then stated that it was thought “all parties agree” that at the January hearing the Court was being asked to consider the first stage only:…”
- Applied — Re M (Children) 2018-03-28
“…e applied to the admission of expert evidence (s.13 of the 2014 Act) and the test for reopening findings (Re Z (Children)(Care Proceedings: Review of Findings) [2015] 1 WLR 95).…”