- Cited — Re: S (A Child) 2023-02-28
“…At the start of her judgment, the judge summarised the parties’ respective cases. The mother relied on Re S (A Child) (Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2012] [2012] 2 AC 257 (“Re S”) and submitted that “if returned, the mother’s anxieties and depression would be of such a degree that they would be likely to destabilise her parentin…”
- Cited — Re B (Children) 2022-08-19
“…grave risk within the scope of Article 13(b). That is why, at [97], I referred to what Lord Wilson had said in In re S (A Child) (Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2012] 2 AC 257, at [22], about the Re E approach forming “part of the court's general process of reasoning in its appraisal of a defence under the article” (emphasis added). …”
- Cited — G (A Child : Child Abduction) 2020-09-15
“…[2012] 2 AC 257 (“Re S (2012)”) at [34] per Lord Wilson, giving the judgment of the court).…”
- Cited — B (A Child), Re (Abduction: Article 13(B)) 2020-08-11
“…authorities to which I propose to refer are In re E (Children) (Abduction: Custody Appeal) [2012] 1 AC 144 and In re S (A Child) (Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2012] 2 AC 257.…”
- Cited — C (Children) (Abduction: Article 13 (B)) 2018-12-20
“…e D (Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2007] 1 AC 619; Re E (Children)(Abduction: Custody Appeal) [2012] 1 AC 444 and Re S (A Child)(Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2012] 2 AC 257.…”
- Cited — Re W 2018-03-27
“…uation, has, he submits, not been shown to be wrong. He reminded us of the observations made by Lord Wilson JSC in Re S (A Child)(Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2012] 2 AC 257 (para 35), warning against too-ready interference with the assessment of the trial judge.…”