- Cited — JC Bamford Excavators Limited v Manitou UK Limited & Anor 2023-07-17
“…es to account for the decisions they make and to enable the public to have confidence that they are doing their job properly. In A v British Broadcasting Corpn [2015] AC 588, Lord Reed JSC reminded us of the comment of Lord Shaw of Dunfermline, in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417, 475, that the two Acts of the Scottish Parliament passed…”
- Explained — Rashid Maqsood Abbasi & Anor v Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 2023-03-31
“…These cases concern open justice, the importance of which was once again recently explained in the judgment of Lord Reed in A v. BBC [2014] UKSC 25; [2015] AC 588 at [23] et seq. The proceedings in Isaiah’s case were in public and Zainab’s would have been. There was a need for RROs at the time, but indefinite orders have…”
- Cited — Michael Clifford v Millicom Services UK Limited & Ors. 2023-01-26
“…For his submission that the two strands of law are “in step”, Mr Callus draws on what Lord Reed said in A v BBC [2014] UKSC 25, [2015] AC 588 at [57]. But Lord Reed was not saying that the two are interchangeable or in all circumstances identical. The words relied on by Mr Callus need to be seen in t…”
- Applied — The Executors of HRH Prince Philip, The Duke of Edinburgh (Deceased) v Guardian News and Media 2022-07-29
“…icle 10) without allowing it to make submissions. That was a serious breach of accepted standards of procedural fairness (see Lord Reed at [66]-[67] in A v.BBC [2015] AC 588 (A v. BBC)). Thirdly, the PFD applied too high a threshold to the question of whether to hold the hearing entirely in private. The decision was disproportionat…”
- Cited — Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police & Ors v Dyer & Ors 2020-10-27
“…[2015] AC 588…”
- Cited — Ali & Anor v Channel 5 Broadcasting Ltd 2019-04-16
“…tice is inextricably linked to the freedom of the media to report on court proceedings”, per Lord Reed in A v British Broadcasting Corporation [2014] UKSC 588, [2015] AC 588 at paragraph 26. The judge noted that the Writ of Possession here was not made after any hearing, or in public, but Channel 5 relied on the rule stated by Warb…”