How many times has [2015] RPC 22 been cited?

[2015] RPC 22 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2015] RPC 22

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2015] RPC 22

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Considered · 1Cited · 1

Cited — Match Group, LLC & Ors. v Muzmatch Limited & Anor. 2023-04-27
“… (vi) has been read into the legislation by the CJEU as a matter of interpretation: see Supreme Petfoods v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch), [2015] RPC 22 at [86]-[134] and the cases discussed there.…”
Considered — Bentley Motors Limited v (1) Bentley 1962 Limited (2) Brandlogic Limited 2020-12-16
“… particular with respect to condition (vi). I considered this question at length in Supreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch), [2015] RPC 22.…”